Peronism was
often lead actor agreements and consultation policies.
There are, moreover, an array of bourgeois thought to ensure the appropriateness of seeking matches.
Some even say that in reality, we all want the same thing and we disagree about methodology.
has even argued that ideology had died and that was enough to pick good managers to govern.
All this is accompanied by a continuous praise of good manners in political discussions and even in social conflicts.
Each time we proposed to our admiration the conduct of princes or antagonists smiling dispensed mutual praise during the negotiations.
These few words will help first to welcome all these ideas that I have outlined.
Who am I to a standing ovation?
But also, as a humble office in dissent, I propose a tentative praise of disagreement, the bifurcation of heterodoxy, heresy.
After all, revolutions arise only disagreements: the man is a single dissident.
I would then highlight the political actions of Nestor Kirchner and manager happy disagreements.
dared to walk the roads that no one dared to walk and looked away from the busy main streets recommending the world's powerful global.
And he got through streets whose names are forgotten and only pronounced in the student forums, in meetings and in corners of dreamers who were always away from political power.
Those streets of disagreement can now be recognized: one leads to the growth of domestic market ...
Another foreign trade control ... Okay
Boulevard of state intervention or the corner of the media law, the square the child allowance and veredones of debt relief.
Some of these streets had been covered by another man in 1946.
political power when someone dares to walk the trails end to reach a district where political power is not in the same place as the economic power.
and fork are inevitable occurs and the attacks of the corporations and the powerful who seek to secure the return of fugitives to the rulers lit avenues of their interests.
many years ago on television there was a debate between Dr. Teodoro Bronzini, Socialist leader and mayor of Mar del Plata, and Dr. Becar Varela who was active in the party who was then at least the courage to admit as a conservative. It was a conversation
very friendly and the moderator was surprised at the end of the program they had agreed on many things.
Actually, not surprisingly, both politicians were part of a liberal vision of the world and were functional to the interests of corporations. How
will not be nice if deep thinking the same thing?
Nestor Kirchner did not seem friendly to corporations.
Indeed, no other president except that another man in 1946, it seemed so bad.
And as anyone attacked
Why?
Kirchner Not because I had a bad temper and was confrontational as he is grumpy.
It was not a question of character: this guy had touched their interests.
And it was the only one who did.
Everyone else seemed acceptable at some point because they were also eventually serve the interests of economic power.
And that's all I wanted to say, sometimes there is no choice but to dissent, to persist in the disagreement.
Today almost the only time in our history, political power is not where economic power.
And this man is gone now produced a final act of `insujeción`.
His death on the light, and as a refusilo saw something that the stubbornness of the media had hidden in the dark side streets, which did not recommend the powerful, were full of people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment