(Photo courtesy gently by Daniel Mancuso )
nearly three years I have been holding the view that much of the media bosses stopped require factual basis to do their work. Unlike the novelists, who can ignore reality to write a good novel, journalists used to require it to develop a story. My impression is that this no longer the case, and a novelist could easily pass unnoticed among the staff newspaper of the media bosses.
too do not need to go back in time to find several stories of this kind lacks anchorage in fact. The "Embassy Parallel" or "Operation Sadous" was one of them, where they own alleged victims refute the story.
In others, the political actors themselves contracted for by the novelist of the moment are denied to themselves, without requiring third parties to do so. For example, the actor I can think Graiver Isidoro, who first claimed that the purchase of Newsprint by the press employer "was an effort" , to say the exact opposite a few months later.
A mini-story of this kind, even more frail and fleeting was the one-man played by Pino Solanas, signing one day a dispatch from its own block for the monopolization of the production of newsprint, to declare themselves "trapped" Just 24 hours later and remove the elbow as he signed with his hand the day before, after his employer publicly reprimanded him.
Other novels that nurture "public opinion" and not require or even be contradicted by their own or third parties lenguaraces: Enough The mere passage of time for the account falls under its own weight. Is sufficient demonstrated in the endless predictions of the cribs failed Chaco, or type "Next year we will import wheat, milk and meat" told by the bucolic agromediático gionistas the putsch. These novels usually catastrophic collapse "futuristic" by default "with the simple passing of the days, without requiring additional denials that exceed the mere non-event of the prophecy.
The basic drama of this set of novels is repeated endlessly on hold for one or two corridor gossip, give them real character of a fist, assign a tone of "crispasión republican", and from the raw material of dubious quality to begin the task of amplifying and legitimizing the story, in which now the author of the novel, now supporting actors of politics in Argentina, will threading Chapters increasingly outrageous and implausible to the saga, to generate a enchastro manners that would cause envy of Emir Kusturica.
The proverbial phrase "Do not let reality ruin your note" rounded the idea of \u200b\u200bthe kind of journalism-fiction novel formerly known as. Never mind the facts. Enough with the story than they do to dominate the agenda.
Now, to the novelist neediest have a minimum set of resources to handle the unexpected. Thus, if an actor dies of his strip, inserted in the script a sudden trip to justify their absence. If the producer of the strip suddenly slashed the budget by half, staged indoors he had written to external actors will bring the road side, bowling, unnecessary decoration, etc. That is, adjust the variables for that despite all, the novel comes to an end without giving up the story. It's the least we can demand a novelist: Being fairly credible and maintain a minimum of coherence.
This week, however, does not even respected this basic rule of narrative. Instead of making a pious "fade out" on "The Cristina Banelco" decided to trace his own account in the opposite direction bringing. To characterize the coimeros Kirchnerism as willing to do anything to pass the budget, went on to characterize it as active promoters of non-sanction of the 2011 budget. So, as it reads. How to say "white black cow" without being oxymoronic move a hair to the novelist.
have to be a little stunned to assume that nobody will notice the sudden change of story, but that is exactly what the former employer efficient spokesman Eduardo van der Kooy. What is more, not even write a note saying "A" Reverse then cast a second note saying "B". If this were the case, the reader should take the trouble seisieteochesco to compare what he said in a note and whether it corresponds with the second. No, no, no. I do not even appeal to the compassionate fading memory of the reader domed by a flood of signs routed. He pulls one way of "As I say this, I tell you what other" in the same single note, and dress up as you can with this that I'm saying.
not go to the bush, leave aside for a moment the curious complaint that goes to victimize the victim (?) Also leave aside the explicit and unequivocal appreciation that is causing "insecurity" for providing essential dramaturgical ram to attack the social torpor which induce the economic boom.
is of note that, in an outburst of sincerity atrocious burps "danger" to Kunkel. It is possible that the epithet has been used as a distracting element that introduces the hinge between two mutually exclusive claims. In this case, would be correct to assume that almost nobody will pay attention to the reversal of the story, distracted by an epithet as phosphorescent as "scourge" .
And just like that (I copied myself above), going to characterize the Kirchnerism like a bunch of willing coimeros to do anything to pass the budget, to blame for not sanction it.
It does so in the following terms:
REPORT I: TO APPROVE THE BUDGET AS OF, The Baldwin is capable of anything, of bribery TO
(...) But what happened in relation to the budget is not an missing link on the very low political and institutional quality of this democracy. (...)
The Baldwin also managed to escape unscathed from one of the last battle, when he managed to neutralize in constitutional matters and investigations into alleged bribery to pressure Members of the opposition. (...)
Allegations and Elsa Alvarez Cynthia Hotton kirchneristas vacancy traits were unfounded and credibility. (...) But Fadel could not hide his shadow this woman Mendoza is an expert in administrative management of the Congress. You know, like nobody, contracts and other favors. (....)
distracting elements:
"Nothing can justify the slap that he dealt with Carlos Camacho Kunkel, when the deputy spoke a wild harangue to justify the end of the parliamentary inquiry. But it would relation to all: perhaps, in a democracy less polluted, the scourge of Kunkel not circulate through the halls of Congress. "
REPORT II: as long as ((NO)) approved the budget, The Baldwin IS CAPABLE OF ALL, TO victimize
(...) passing on to others the lack of budget approved for 2011, but was himself kirchnerismo which exhibited no desire to do so. (...) ----
--------
emphasize the fact that this was written by one of the luminaries of the media bosses, not by Makhoul, a Lanata, a Leuco, a Eliaschev. No, no. This is the maximum can offer in terms of story. An oxymoron.
Let's see, Manet, if you get half stack and a librettist conseguis you consistently. Do not be achieved with the semiology of Eliseo Veron. Need a writer and / or writer and / or playwright as Abel Santa Cruz, Aida Bortnik, Fernandez Baraibar, a Marguerite Yourcenar, who knows. So will not eh? Muuucho noticed ...
In the words of Simone de Beauvoir's ineffable Argent, "I leave it up to you" ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment